
Royer Advisors and Accountants is the full-service accounting, tax, and business advisory firm you rely on for answers, advice, and solutions for success.

Business Tax, Accounting + Advising
From routine tax preparation to complex reviews, sophisticated accounting to CFO services, Royer helps small and medium-sized businesses from start to success to succession.

Maine's Premier Dental Accounting Firm
Specializing in financial management, consulting, reviews, reporting, valuation, buying, and selling of dental practices, Royer is more than expert CPA services.

Municipal Auditing
An independent, risk-based approach to ensure the accuracy of your financial information and the highest level of assurance.

Valuation and Litigation Support Expertise
Who We Serve
Medium-sized businesses in construction, real estate, and manufacturing as well as closely held companies
Dental practices
Municipalities and school districts
The Royer Report
U.S. District Court (California) Denies Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Documents in a Case Involving Uber
Boston Ret. Sys. v. Uber Techs., Inc., 2024. The lead plaintiff, Boston Retirement System filed a motion to compel production of unredacted versions of 28 documents nonparty PricewaterhouseCoopers produced. Uber Technologies Inc. asserted that the work product doctrine shielded the redacted portions. The documents were in four categories: impairment assessments, forensic memoranda, emails, and management representation letters. The court ordered Boston Retirement System to provide one example of each category one, two, and four for in camera review. Uber was ordered to provide unredacted copies of all emails at issue.
Delaware Chancery Court Determines That Reducing Potential Personal Liability Exposure Through a Change in Corporate Domicile Constituted a Nonratable Benefit
Palkon v. Maffei, 2024 This was a suit where the minority shareholders challenged the conversion of two Delaware corporations into Nevada corporations with the controlling shareholder delivering the deciding vote the admitted purpose of which was reducing potential...
Supreme Court (Alaska) Affirms Trial Court Calculation of Active Appreciation
The Alaska Supreme Court made three rulings in this, but we focus the digest on the second ruling, that the trial court did not err in valuing the business’s active appreciation. The trial court’s explanation was reasonable and considered aspects of the reports. Each spouse appealed certain aspects of the trial court’s order dividing their property. The wife appealed that the trial court erred in valuing the active appreciation of the business, and the husband challenged the trial court’s valuation of the active appreciation of real property rented to the business. The supreme court affirmed the trial court property division in all aspects.