
Royer Advisors and Accountants is the full-service accounting, tax, and business advisory firm you rely on for answers, advice, and solutions for success.

Business Tax, Accounting + Advising
From routine tax preparation to complex reviews, sophisticated accounting to CFO services, Royer helps small and medium-sized businesses from start to success to succession.

Maine's Premier Dental Accounting Firm
Specializing in financial management, consulting, reviews, reporting, valuation, buying, and selling of dental practices, Royer is more than expert CPA services.

Municipal Auditing
An independent, risk-based approach to ensure the accuracy of your financial information and the highest level of assurance.

Valuation and Litigation Support Expertise
Who We Serve
Medium-sized businesses in construction, real estate, and manufacturing as well as closely held companies
Dental practices
Municipalities and school districts
The Royer Report
Appellate Court (Ohio) Affirms Trial Court’s Acceptance of Husband’s Expert’s Value of Marital Business and Rejects Wife’s Expert’s Value
Granada v. Rojas, 2024-Ohio-1272; 2024 Adriana Granada appealed from the final decree following her divorce from Israel Rojas. The appellate court affirmed the decision of the trial court. Factual and procedural history. In November 2020, Rojas filed for divorce...
Indiana Appellate Court Remands to Revalue Wife’s Business Supported by the Evidence
Bergquist v. Bergquist, 2024 Trishia Bergquist (the wife) appealed the Indiana Stueben County Circuit Court’s dissolution decree to the Indiana Court of Appeals. Several issues were raised. This digest covers the issue as to whether the circuit court abused its...
Ohio Court of Appeals Affirms the Value of Husband’s Business Based on ‘the Evidence That Was Actually Before the Trial Court’
In this appeal of a divorce case in Ohio, the appellate court affirmed that the trial court, in having independently determined the value of the husband’s business without having instructed the parties to produce evidence to support the value, did not abuse its discretion. The wife did not dispute the specificities of the trial court’s valuation nor challenge the credibility of the husband’s testimony.