Arizona Appeals Court Affirms Trial Court’s Acceptance of a Calculation of Value

by Royer Advisors | Dec 11, 2024 | Court Rulings, Valuations

Mikalacki v. Rubezic This Arizona divorce appeal affirmed the trial court’s acceptance of a calculation of value the wife’s expert, Brendan Kennedy, offered to determine the value of the couple’s law firm awarded to the husband in the trial. The husband appealed other...

U.S. District Court Partially Denies Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding Qui Tam Case on Excess Purchase Price Under the False Claims Act

by Royer Advisors | Dec 11, 2024 | Court Rulings

Kuzma v. N. Ariz. Healthcare Corp This was a case regarding a motion for summary judgment against the plaintiff, Gregory Kuzma, alleging violations of the False Claims Act (FCA) by the defendants, Northern Arizona Healthcare Corp. et al. (NAHC). NAHC acquired the...

U.S. District Court Rules on Known or Knowable Issue and Allows Testimony of SEC Valuation Expert—Can Be Challenged on Cross-Examination

by Royer Advisors | Dec 11, 2024 | Court Rulings

SEC v. Bluepoint Inv. Counsel The opinion digested here was a short ruling on three motions to exclude testimony. We discuss the motion to exclude (by inference) the testimony of the SEC’s expert, Ms. McMahon. The defendant’s motion asked the court to exclude any...

The Supreme Court of New Jersey Accepts Trial Court’s Value of Companies and Denies a Marketability Discount in a Long-Running Contentious Shareholder Buyout Dispute

by Royer Advisors | Dec 11, 2024 | Court Rulings

Sipko v. Koger, Inc. This shareholder oppression and buyout litigation have been going on since November 2007. The Supreme Court of New Jersey once again stepped in. It reversed the appellate court’s decisions, remanding the case to the trial court. The Supreme...

Ohio Appellate Court Affirms Trial Court’s Denial of Permanent Injunction and Dismisses a Claim of Tortious Interference

by Royer Advisors | Dec 11, 2024 | Court Rulings

Total Quality Logistics, LLC v. Tucker, Albin, and Assocs. An Ohio appellate court affirmed the trial court’s denial of a permanent injunction to the plaintiff because the evidence did not show that it faced immediate and irreparable injury or harm. It was also held...