by Royer Advisors | Dec 11, 2024 | Court Rulings, Valuations
Puklich v. Puklich A buyout dispute between siblings who owned several businesses generated a noteworthy decision from the North Dakota Supreme Court on the use of valuation discounts. Reviewing the applicable case law, the high court found the trial court, in...
by Royer Advisors | Dec 11, 2024 | Court Rulings, Divorce Litigation
Oudheusden v. Oudheusden In a noteworthy decision, a Connecticut appellate court recently found the trial court double dipped when it divided the marital assets and calculated spousal support. Although attorneys from both sides had alerted the trial court to the risk...
by Royer Advisors | Dec 11, 2024 | Court Rulings
Sabre GLBL, Inc. v. Shan This damages case, which centered on an employee’s breach of fiduciary duties and other misconduct toward her former employer, and which went to arbitration, includes an informative discussion of the difference between head start damages and...
by Royer Advisors | Dec 11, 2024 | Court Rulings, Valuations
Schewe v. Schewe Farms In a family dispute featuring a farm business that owned real estate, the parties’ experts disagreed on an issue that was pivotal to how they would value the sellers’ distributional interest. The trial court resolved the valuation dispute by...
by Royer Advisors | Dec 11, 2024 | Court Rulings, Divorce Litigation, Valuations
Burchfield v. Burchfield Among a host of issues, this Virginia divorce case, which included a prominent Washington, D.C., lawyer and his estranged wife, raised an important valuation question related to the husband’s partnership interest in the firm: Whether...
by Royer Advisors | Dec 11, 2024 | Court Rulings, Valuations
Acosta v. Wilmington Trust In this ESOP litigation, both parties tried to exclude the opposing side’s valuation expert testimony under Rule 702 and Daubert. The court noted that, at this stage in the proceedings, its focus was on whether the experts applied reliable...
